| This is the bit where we get to show off! We can spout all day about how great we are, but we're really only as good as the research we produce. Here we give you some examples of the work we have conducted so that you can make up your own mind:
Evaluation of Operation Gallant This study involved secondary analysis of the Home Office Car Theft Index data and showed that the introduction of compulsory immobilisation on all new vehicles was associated with a significant reduction in thefts of cars. The research also showed a degree of displacement of temporary theft towards older vehicles and in crime switch involving the professional theft of newer vehicles. See Brown (2004) ‘The Effectiveness of Electronic Immobilisation: Changing Patterns of Temporary and Permanent Vehicle Theft’ Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 17, pp 99-118. Evaluation of the Arson Control Forum’s New Projects Initiative Between 2002 and 2004, Evidence Led Solutions, working in association with Morgan Harris Burrows and CRG Research undertook an evaluation of 30 projects that were funded by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister to tackle a range of different forms of arson. The evaluation included interviews with project personnel and stakeholders, collection of inputs, outputs and outcomes, analysis of available data and a cost-benefit analysis that showed the programme was cost-effective. Click here to see full report Click here to see summary report Evaluation of the Arson Control Forum’s Implementation Fund Evidence Led Solutions, in association with Morgan Harris Burrows and CRG Research is currently undertaking an evaluation of 30 arson reduction projects, funded by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The evaluation included interviews with project personnel and stakeholders, collection of inputs, outputs and outcomes, analysis of available data and a cost-benefit analysis that showed the programme was cost-effective. Although this research is ongoing, the ODPM have published one paper based on the research: Brown R., Hopkins M., Cannings, A., Payne, S. and Raybould S. (2006) “Evaluation of the Arson Control Forum Implementation
Fund: Emerging Findings” ACF Research Bulletin No. 7. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Evaluation of Crack Cocaine Operations in Cambridge During 2003 and 2004, the team undertook an evaluation of police operations designed to tackle the crack cocaine market in Cambridge City. The evaluation focused on interviewing project personnel, multi-agency partners involved in the project, and members of the local community where the operations were undertaken. The evaluation also involved an impact analysis using available crime data and drugs related intelligence.
This evaluation involved over 160 qualitative interviews with
a range of stakeholder groups. These included interviews with members of the
community, victims, witnesses, offenders, magistrates and court staff. The
findings identified a number of ways in which the initiative could be improved
when rolled out in future.
This guide, commissioned by the National Audit Office,
explores ways in which local agencies can identify, target and work with
offenders involved in the theft of vehicles.
This guide, commissioned by the US Department of Justice and
co-authored with Professor Mike Scott, Director of the Centre for Problem
Oriented Policing, provides advice on how to
turn a planned initiative into action.
ELS teamed up with the Thames Valley Partnership to produce
this user friendly guide for local partnerships on conducting drugs market
reduction projects.
During 2008, we undertook a detailed needs assessment in
Kildare Town, using a wide range of innovative methods. These included
training community members to interview others in the community, distributing
cameras, making videos with community groups and surveying all households in
the town.
In November 2009, we completed a
study for the Association of Police Authorities on confidence in the police.
This resulted in two publications. The first provided an overview of the
literature associated with confidence in the police. The second was a guide
for police authorities and police forces on how to improve confidence in the
police.
|